
Arena Blog
Data-driven insights on trading strategies, backtests, and market analysis.
37–48 of 64 posts · page 4 of 6
Bitcoin Yield: Where It Comes From — and What You Sell for It
Bitcoin has no native yield. Every advertised BTC yield is a sold option, a loan, or a token emission. And with the income ETFs, the window decides whether the answer flatters or destroys.
The Gap Tax: Your Daily Backtest Fills at a Price You Can't Trade — How Big Is the Error Really?
Daily backtests compute the signal from the close and fill at that same close — a price you can no longer trade. We recomputed 7,000+ trades twice (close fill vs. next open) to size the distortion. Result: smaller than the myth.
A Backtest With a 100% Win Rate: We're Testing It — Rules Set Before We Compute
A backtest claiming a 100% win rate and 34 million percent returns is circulating. We're rebuilding it — and setting the rules before we compute.
The Copper/Gold Ratio: An Overrated Macro Signal for Bitcoin
The copper/gold ratio is sold as a macro and Bitcoin signal. What it actually measures, where it fails, and why a viral "Bitcoin cycle" indicator built on it has look-ahead bias.
Opening Range Breakout: Real Strategy, Oversold Story
ORB is sold as the holy grail of intraday trading. What the strategy really is, why the viral result misleads, and what makes or breaks an honest ORB backtest.
When Fees Kill a Strategy: Why We Benched Our Second-Most-Popular One
Our backtest engine used to compute returns before costs. We built a net-of-cost layer that re-prices every fill at a realistic fee — and it flipped our second-most-popular strategy negative after fees. Here is the math, the numbers, and why "beats buy-and-hold" is half a truth until you pay the fees.
AI in the Drug-Discovery Race: Shovels, Bets, Giants
Asking which company is well-positioned in the AI drug-discovery race is really three questions at once. We sort the field soberly into shovels, bets, and giants — and show which layer earns regardless of any single trial outcome.
We Rebuilt Our Worst Strategy Correctly — It Worked — and Cut It Anyway
Our Bollinger Squeeze strategy lost to Buy & Hold by double digits on crypto. Before deleting it, we rebuilt it to the modern standard (TTM Squeeze). The rebuild turned positive — and we retired it anyway. Why "it works now" isn't enough.
We Fixed Our Fibonacci Strategy — and Retired It Anyway
Auditing 40,000 backtests, our Fibonacci strategy came up short. Before cutting it we asked: is it our config? A better exit made it 20 points better — and we retired it anyway. Why "beats Buy & Hold" isn't the bar.
40,000 Backtests Later: Which of Our Own Strategies We're Killing
We audited 40,000 of our own backtests — and benched several of our own strategies in the process. Here is what we killed, what we reactivated, and the uncomfortable core lesson: whether a strategy is "good" depends less on the strategy than on the asset class it runs in.
40,000 Backtests — What the Data Says Now (and What Changed Since 10k)
Five weeks ago it was 10,000 backtests; today it's over 40,000. With 4x the data, the "beats Buy & Hold" rate falls from 64% to 52%, four in five runs land below 50% win rate, and one memecoin still holds its 197,923% record. What selection bias does to sample size — on real numbers.
Option vs. Annuity Machine: Two Ways to Be Invested in the Same AI-Healthcare Sector
"Invested in AI healthcare" can mean two almost opposite things. Two real companies show it: an annuity machine with ~86% recurring revenue — and an option with not a single approved drug. Same label, opposite risk DNA.
Don't miss new blog posts
One short email per new post — strategies, backtests, market analysis. No spam, unsubscribe with one click anytime.
By subscribing you accept our privacy policy. We use Resend for delivery. Double opt-in confirmation required.