Backtesting ArenaBacktesting Arena
← Back to blog

What Is Algorand – and Where Do the 5 Percent for ALGO Stakers Come From?

Staking ALGO pays roughly 5 percent a year. The network takes in about $142 a day in fees, around 170 times less than it pays out. The rest comes from the Algorand Foundation, committed for about 24 months from January 2025. What Algorand does, who really uses it, who holds and sells ALGO, and how the price has done against bitcoin.

Backtesting Arena·October 13, 2026·16 min read·4 views
What Is Algorand – and Where Do the 5 Percent for ALGO Stakers Come From?

On 29 July 2026, ALGO closed at $0.0775, lower than ever before. Since its first trading day in June 2019, the token has lost 96.4 percent, while bitcoin gained 723 percent over the same period. Then came September: up 44.7 percent in a single month.

If you are thinking about buying now, you quickly run into a second argument besides the price. Since January 2025, staking ALGO pays rewards of roughly 5 percent a year. That sounds like a network paying its participants.

Before you put that into your calculation, one question is worth asking: where does this money actually come from? From the fees users pay? Or from somewhere else?

What Algorand does: blocks by lottery

Algorand is a blockchain of its own, running since June 2019. It was developed by the company Algorand Inc., founded by Silvio Micali. Since March 2026, development has been in the hands of the Algorand Foundation, the foundation behind the network.

The method is called pure proof of stake. It works like this: anyone who holds ALGO and is online takes part in a kind of lottery. For every block, the draw decides who may propose it and who votes on it in a small committee. The more ALGO someone holds, the bigger their chance of being drawn.

On average, a new block arrives every 2.75 seconds. In 2019 it was about 4.4 seconds.

So much for the principle. But what sets Algorand apart from other chains?

What makes Algorand special: final at once

A block on Algorand is final as soon as the committee has certified it. A payment can no longer be reversed after that, according to the documentation "without the possibility of forks". On Ethereum, it takes about 12.8 minutes for a block to count as final. On Algorand, it takes under 3 seconds.

Then there is the name behind it. In 2012, Silvio Micali won the Turing Award together with Shafi Goldwasser, the most important prize in computer science. For a crypto project, that is an unusually strong founder.

On the technical side, what was announced has also been delivered:

  • Smart contracts have been running since August 2020.
  • State proofs since September 2022: compact proofs that let other systems check Algorand's state.
  • Post-quantum accounts since 22 August 2026: accounts signed with the Falcon-1024 scheme, meant to hold up against future quantum computers too.

A scan of block times since 2019 finds no main-network outage longer than 30 minutes.

If the story ended here, Algorand would deserve its reputation.

The technology delivers what it promises.

Which leaves the question of who actually uses this technology, and for what.

Who uses Algorand: many transactions, few senders

At first glance, usage looks good. In the 30 days from 12 September to 11 October 2026, Algorand processed 1.13 million transactions a day. That is more than NEAR or Avalanche.

ChainTransactions per dayFees per day
Algorand1,133,977$142
NEAR865,015$5,996
Avalanche C-Chain482,328$14,561

12 Sep–11 Oct 2026. Algorand via the chain's own counters, fees from a sample of 2,000 blocks; NEAR and Avalanche via their own statistics interfaces.

On transactions, Algorand is ahead. On what gets paid for them, it is far behind: $142 a day, about a hundredth of what Avalanche takes in.

Who sends all these transactions? A sample of 200 random blocks shows:

  • 45 senders account for 82.1 percent of all transactions. Each of them sends at least 1,500 transactions a day, extrapolated. No person does that by hand.
  • 19.3 percent are entries that store chess rankings on the chain: transfers of zero ALGO to oneself, with players and ratings attached. Who runs this could not be determined.
  • 6.7 percent come from the so-called "mining" of the token Orange (ORA), which is a single app.

The record days look the same. On 1 January 2024 there were 44.48 million transactions, more than on any day before or since. 97.6 percent of them came from the Orange app. On 13 June 2024 there were 27.28 million, 86.8 percent of them from a single sender.

The money working on the chain has shrunk too:

todaypeak
Deposited in DeFi applications (TVL)$38.4m$319.1m (10 Feb 2024)
Stablecoins$69.6m$430.7m (24 May 2022)

DefiLlama, 12 Oct 2026.

The platform rwa.xyz lists $55.8 million in tokenized securities on Algorand. That is exactly one asset: the share of the wallet company Exodus.

On Algorand, the transaction count says little. What counts is the $142 in fees per day.

And those fees are exactly where you would expect the staking yield to come from. Are they enough?

The core: the foundation pays the yield, not the network

Since 23 January 2025, Algorand has had so-called consensus incentives. Anyone who holds at least 30,000 ALGO and is online with their own node gets a reward when they propose a block. The reward has two parts: half of the fees in that block and a fixed bonus, currently 8.26 ALGO per block.

This is how much was paid out, compared with what users pay:

30 days, 12 Sep–11 Oct 2026ALGO
paid out to stakers6.54m
paid in fees by users37,898

Annualized, that is about 79.6 million ALGO for stakers and about 0.46 million ALGO in fees. For every ALGO the network takes in, about 170 ALGO go out in rewards.

Where does the difference come from? The answer is in Algorand's own documentation. Payouts come from a pot called the fee sink, and the foundation fills it. The bonus is "unsustainable from protocol fees". The foundation will top up the pot "for several years".

For how long exactly? The foundation's staking FAQ says "approximately 24 months" from the start. That would be around January 2027. What comes after has not been announced.

The program has worked all the same. The stake taking part in consensus rose from 1,256 million ALGO at the start in January 2025 to 2,026 million in October 2026, an increase of about 60 percent. Just under a fifth of it, 19.4 percent, is the foundation's own stake, though.

The difference from other staking models matters. On many chains, rewards come from newly created tokens, so the yield dilutes all holders. Not on Algorand: all 10 billion ALGO have existed since the first block. The reward is a transfer from the foundation's holdings, with an expiry date.

The 5 percent is not income from usage. It is a subsidy with an expiry date.

But is that a problem as long as the foundation has enough ALGO?

The obvious objection

"The foundation holds over a billion ALGO. At 80 million a year, that lasts a long time."

Arithmetically, that is true. At the end of June 2026, the foundation held 1,036 million ALGO. At 79.6 million a year, that would last about 13 years.

But the foundation has not committed to any of that. The commitment covers about 24 months, and there is no published plan for the time after. A new fee and incentive model called "Project King Safety" was announced for the fourth quarter of 2025. According to the forum, it was postponed in April 2026 and has not been published to date.

And the foundation's holdings shrink for a second reason: it sells.

Whether the subsidy continues is up to the foundation, not the network.

How much does it sell, and when?

Tokenomics: who holds ALGO and who sells

The basic numbers are simple. There are at most 10 billion ALGO, and all of them were created in the first block. No new ones are added, and nothing is burned either: fees go into the fee sink, not into nothing. 9.07 billion are in circulation, or 90.7 percent.

One detail: everything not held directly by the foundation counts as "circulating". ALGO owned by Algorand Inc. therefore count as circulating, even if they were never on the market.

The foundation has been selling for years. Its holdings according to its own transparency reports:

DateFoundation holdings (m ALGO)
30 Sep 20222,993
31 Dec 20231,972
31 Dec 20241,645
31 Dec 20251,135
30 Jun 20261,036

Almost two thirds are gone in just under four years. Part went into rewards and grant programs, a large part was sold:

  • In 2023, the foundation sold 473.7 million ALGO over the counter to the market maker DWF Labs for a total of $50 million. That is about $0.106 per ALGO.
  • In November 2024, ALGO rose 287.8 percent. In the two quarters after that, the foundation sold 110 million (Q4 2024) and 174 million ALGO (Q1 2025).
  • Since then, the pace has slowed: in the second quarter of 2026 it was 10.6 million.

The foundation has set itself rules for its sales: a daily maximum or a small share of trading volume, whichever is lower, and an automatic stop if the price falls 10 percent within 24 hours. The reports are not checked by outsiders; they carry the note "not audited".

The pattern is not new. In 2019, early investors got a rule under which their ALGO were released faster whenever the price reached a new 30-day high. In February and March 2021, more than 1 billion ALGO were released this way, and another 798 million in September 2021. Both fell into months in which the price rose sharply.

Who owns the rest? The ten largest accounts together hold 25.1 percent of all ALGO. None of them is labeled, none takes part in consensus, and none verifiably belongs to the foundation. Who owns them could not be established.

When ALGO rises, supply comes in. That was the case in 2021 and again in 2024.

What does that mean for the price over the long run?

The price against bitcoin: rises that did not last

Since its first trading day on Binance, 22 June 2019, ALGO has lost 96.4 percent. Bitcoin gained 723.1 percent over the same period.

Calendar years compared:

YearALGOBitcoin
2019 (from 22 Jun)−93.6 %−29.2 %
2020+54.7 %+302.0 %
2021+394.8 %+59.8 %
2022−89.6 %−64.2 %
2023+29.2 %+155.6 %
2024+50.1 %+121.3 %
2025−67.0 %−6.3 %
2026 (Jan–Sep)+12.1 %−4.6 %

ALGO beat bitcoin only in 2021 and, so far, in 2026.

Of 88 months, 39 ended up and 49 down. In 36 months ALGO was ahead of bitcoin. And when bitcoin fell, ALGO usually fell with it: of 40 down months for bitcoin, ALGO was also down in 34, with a median of −18.6 percent against −8.1 percent for bitcoin.

The high on a daily close was $2.3793 on 12 September 2021. The low came on 29 July 2026 at $0.0775.

What came after the big rises. Six times, ALGO rose more than 50 percent in a month. This is where it stood 180 days later:

MonthALGO in monthBitcoin in monthALGO 180 days laterBitcoin 180 days laterWhat was behind it
07/2020+57.1 %+24.0 %+65.4 %+167.9 %broad market rally
08/2020+53.5 %+2.8 %+118.8 %+295.8 %ALGO only: transaction wave from one app family
01/2021+94.3 %+14.4 %+30.9 %+27.5 %broad altcoin rally
02/2021+56.8 %+36.4 %+4.2 %+8.7 %broad rally; release of over 1bn ALGO
12/2023+66.6 %+12.1 %−37.3 %+42.9 %broad rally (AVAX, NEAR, SOL)
11/2024+287.8 %+37.2 %−52.8 %+9.5 %broad rally (XLM, XRP, HBAR, ADA)

Binance monthly candles, 180 days from month-end close. "Broad rally": the median of eleven comparable coins also rose sharply in the same month.

In five of six cases, ALGO was behind bitcoin 180 days later. Only after January 2021 was it narrowly ahead. Four of the six rises were not an ALGO story but moved with the whole market.

September 2021 is missing from the table because, at +46.2 percent, it fell just short of 50. It brought the all-time high, in the middle of a release of 798 million ALGO to early investors and shortly after the announcement of a "$300 million" fund. 180 days after that high, ALGO stood 70.5 percent lower, bitcoin 15.9 percent.

And usage? Whether ALGO rose or fell in a month has had almost nothing to do, since 2023, with whether transactions went up or down. The rank correlation is 0.13, where 1 would be perfect lockstep and 0 none at all. In January 2024, transactions almost tripled, and ALGO fell 28.6 percent.

This is what the last twelve months looked like:

Oct 25NovDecJan 26FebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
−14.7 (−3.9)−23.0 (−17.6)−19.1 (−3.0)−5.9 (−10.2)−15.5 (−14.9)+6.8 (+2.0)+17.6 (+11.8)+15.6 (−3.5)−35.0 (−20.4)−4.9 (+7.3)+8.5 (+25.0)+44.7 (+6.4)

ALGO in percent, bitcoin in brackets.

September 2026 did not move alone either: NEAR rose 178 percent in the same month, AVAX 51 percent. Whether ALGO holds on this time can only be read from late December.

The rises came with the market and then went again. Usage did not carry the price.

That leaves the partnerships Algorand is often marketed with. What is left of them?

What was announced and what can be checked

AnnouncementWho, whenWhat can be shown todayVerdict
Marshall Islands digital currency SOV on AlgorandSFB Technologies and Algorand, 3 Mar 2020no launch traceable; in 2025 the Marshall Islands issued USDM1 on Stellarnot implemented
Land-registry infrastructure in El SalvadorKoibanx with the government, late August 2021no live operation traceablenot verifiable
FIFA: sponsor of the 2022 World Cup and the 2023 Women's World CupFIFA release, 2 May 2022since late November 2022 Algorand no longer activates its sponsorship rights, staying only a technical partnerpartly, downgraded
SIAE copyrights as NFTsSIAE and Algorand, 25 Mar 2021project launch documented, continued operation notpartly
World Chess / FIDEsince 2019, latest contract 20 Oct 2025running, paid from the foundation's staking rewards (estimated about $700,000 a year)verified, as a paid partnership
PlanetWatch (air-quality data)since 2020, about 35 % of all transactions in 2020/21taken over in March 2024, moved to Solanadiscontinued
Viridis fund of "$300 million"foundation, 10 Sep 2021meant 150 million ALGO at the price of the day; payout not documentedpartly
Borderless Capital fund of $500 millionCoinDesk, 30 Nov 2021amount actually invested not documentedpartly
Tether (USDT) on Algorand–issuance stopped 24 Jun 2024, $0.84m leftdiscontinued
"Carbon negative"foundation, 22 Apr 2021no tonnage, no registry, no audit publishednot verifiable
Exodus share on Algorandsince 2021$55.8m per rwa.xyzverified
Post-quantum accountsroadmaplive since 22 Aug 2026verified

What was delivered is the technology. What was not delivered is above all the state projects: none of them verifiably runs on Algorand. The partnerships with big names from sport and chess are sponsorship, and for World Chess the foundation even pays explicitly out of its staking rewards.

Algorand paid for the big names itself. They bring hardly any fees on the chain.

What follows from this for you?

What this means for you

  • Read the staking yield as a subsidy. Roughly 5 percent a year comes from the foundation's holdings, not from usage. The network takes in about one hundred-and-seventieth of that in fees.
  • Note January 2027. That is how far the commitment reaches. Whether and how it continues after that has not been announced. The foundation's transparency reports come out quarterly and show how much was paid out and sold.
  • Expect supply when the price rises. In 2021 there were releases for early investors, in 2024 sales by the foundation.
  • Watch fees, not transactions. As long as 45 senders produce most transactions and the network takes in $142 a day, usage is no reason for ALGO to rise.

What is not claimed here: that Algorand is technically weak, or that the price has to fall. The technology holds up. The open question is whether, once the subsidy ends, there will be enough paid usage to keep stakers. That is the next number that can be measured.

FAQ

What happens to staking rewards after January 2027? That has not been announced. The documentation only says the bonus cannot be carried by fees and that the foundation will top up the pot "for several years". The announced new model "Project King Safety" has been postponed.

Why does Algorand count so many transactions? The chain's count also includes transactions that smart contracts trigger internally. About two thirds, some 750,000 a day, were signed by someone directly. Among those, too, a few automated senders account for a large share.

Are ALGO burned, as on Ethereum? No. Fees go into the fee sink, which also pays the staking rewards. DefiLlama's statement that all fees are burned is wrong.

Do the ALGO held by Algorand Inc. count as circulating? Yes. Since 2021, everything not held directly by the foundation counts as circulating.

How it was measured

All values retrieved on 12 October 2026 between 13:05 and 13:50 UTC. Usage via the chain's counters (algod, indexer), fees and composition from samples (2,000 block headers, 200 blocks with 7,325 transactions), peak days via 40 random blocks each. Active addresses via Artemis, TVL and stablecoins via DefiLlama, tokenized assets via rwa.xyz. Staking payouts from block headers; annual figures are simple extrapolations of the 30-day window. Foundation holdings and sales from the transparency reports 2021 to Q2 2026. Prices from Binance monthly and daily candles, monthly return = month-end close over previous month-end close, the first month from the listing on 22 June 2019. Comparison coins for the rallies: XRP, XLM, HBAR, ADA, AVAX, SOL, XTZ, EOS, NEAR, DOGE, ETH. Price against usage via Spearman rank correlation, 45 months from 2023.

All ALGO monthly returns in US dollars

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2019–––––−57.4−60.9−28.0−38.7−11.6+19.8−18.1
2020+14.1+30.8−52.4+35.9+11.4−10.7+57.1+53.5−30.9−28.3+32.2+1.9
2021+94.3+56.8+33.8+2.6−33.3−5.6−5.0+32.6+46.2+12.4−0.9−8.4
2022−42.7−8.6+7.0−39.0−27.5−23.5+6.8−14.2+22.5+1.4−30.9−30.4
2023+39.9+1.2−7.5−20.3−18.0−17.6−9.8−15.2+11.0+5.8+22.4+66.6
2024−28.6+33.0+26.5−33.5+5.6−23.2−6.1−9.1+8.8−14.7+287.8−24.6
2025+13.4−37.3−24.3+22.2−11.9−4.3+31.6−5.1−10.2−14.7−23.0−19.1
2026−5.9−15.5+6.8+17.6+15.6−35.0−4.9+8.5+44.7–––

Binance ALGOUSDT, month-end close against previous month-end close in percent; June 2019 from the opening on 22 Jun 2019 ($3.40).

Not investment advice, not a recommendation, not a forecast — historical patterns are no promise.

Study the Past — Improve your Future 🥋

Try it yourself

Run the backtest with your own parameters and time ranges.

Run backtest →

More on this topic

Asset Analysis

What Is Kaspa – and Why Does Its Fast Network Earn Only $94 a Day in Fees?

Backtesting Arenatradingstrategies.work

Kaspa delivered: ten blocks per second since May 2025, smart contracts since June 2026. Yet users pay the network about 94 dollars in fees a day, less than Dogecoin, while new coins worth 71,500 dollars go to miners daily. What Kaspa does, who uses it, how its supply works, and why every upgrade so far was followed by a lag against bitcoin.

On-chainMarket structureCrypto
Oct 13, 20261 min
Asset Analysis

What Is Zcash – and Why Does Its Privacy Cost Ten Times as Much as Monero's?

Backtesting Arenatradingstrategies.work

Zcash can hide what Bitcoin and Lightning cannot: the amount. Private use grew as fast as the price last year. But per private transaction the market pays ten times what it pays for Monero, and the few who carry that price have stopped buying.

Market structureOn-chainCrypto
Oct 9, 20261 min
Asset Analysis

What Is Venice – and What Is a Token Worth That Pays You a Dollar of AI Compute Every Day?

Backtesting Arenatradingstrategies.work

Venice sells private AI, and its DIEM token pays out one dollar of API credit every day. A DIEM costs about $1,870 on the market, but minting a new one locks up VVV worth about $11,500. What Venice does, how DIEM works, who controls the supply, and how VVV has done against bitcoin.

AI agentsOn-chainCrypto
Oct 8, 20261 min
Asset Analysis

What Is Avalanche – and Do Its Blockchains Still Need AVAX?

Backtesting Arenatradingstrategies.work

Every new blockchain on Avalanche used to lock up AVAX: 2,000 per validator. Since the Etna upgrade in December 2024, all 577 active validators of Avalanche's own chains pay about 9,200 AVAX a year combined. What Avalanche does, who uses it, what really carries the token, and how AVAX has done against bitcoin.

On-chainTokenized assetsCrypto
Oct 7, 20261 min
📬

Don't miss new blog posts

One short email per new post — strategies, backtests, market analysis. No spam, unsubscribe with one click anytime.

By subscribing you accept our privacy policy. We use Resend for delivery. Double opt-in confirmation required.

Comments (0)

Join free to post comments.

Sign up →

No comments yet. Be the first!