Three state-backed settlement systems are trying to reduce USD dominance in cross-border payments — with very different architectures:

• PAPSS (since 2022): classical RTGS, intra-African, local currencies, 12 countries live
• CIPS (since 2015): hybrid RTGS+netting, China-centric, $24.5T volume in 2024, now multi-currency
• mBridge (pilot): CBDC bridge, custom blockchain, $55B cumulative, 95% e-CNY share

Strategic drivers are similar (dedollarization, sanctions resilience), but technology and reach differ entirely. Anyone saying "stablecoins disrupt banking" misses that banking itself is currently reinventing post-USD settlement.

The Geopolitical Frame

Since the Russia sanctions of 2022, something has shifted that previously existed only in think-tank papers: countries are actively building settlement infrastructure that works without SWIFT, without US correspondent banks, without USD.

This isn't "crypto disrupts banking." This is banking disrupting itself because the geopolitical preconditions for USD dominance are eroding.

Three systems are particularly interesting — not because they're already large (two are small), but because they represent different architectural bets.

System 1: PAPSS — Africa Builds Its Own

What It Is

PAPSS (Pan-African Payment and Settlement System) launched in January 2022 in Accra, backed by Afreximbank and the African Union. Goal: settle intra-African payments directly in local currencies, without the detour through USD correspondent banks.

Status May 2026

• 15 central banks signed on
• 160+ commercial banks live in 12 countries
• February 2026: Pesalink integration connects Kenya's mobile-money backbone to PAPSS
• Nigeria-Ghana corridor: transaction costs fell from 8% to 2%, agricultural exports +12% within 6 months

Tech Stack

PAPSS is not a blockchain. It's classical RTGS infrastructure (Real-Time Gross Settlement), centralized at Afreximbank, ISO 20022 messaging, headquartered in Cairo.

The settlement logic is elegant: PAPSS nets claims between central banks at end-of-day to zero. Bilaterally, only open balances get settled — in a reserve currency or via bilateral swap lines.

Strengths

• Politically anchored through AfCFTA mandate and AU backing
• Local-currency-first, avoids USD FX risk in intra-African trade
• Native bank integration, no crypto off-ramp needed

Weaknesses

• Slow adoption: 4 years post-launch, only 12 countries live
• Banking-hours constraint despite RTGS architecture
• Low SME awareness: small businesses still use informal corridors or Tron-USDT
• Mobile money only since 2026, previously banking-only

What PAPSS Means Strategically

PAPSS is the conservative answer to USD dominance: same architecture as SWIFT/RTGS, but organized continent-wide for Africa. No technological revolution, but a political one — the AU is saying: "We can operate this ourselves."

For crypto bulls, that's disappointing. For cross-border payment professionals, it's solid. Both are correct.

System 2: CIPS — China Has the Big Brother

What It Is

CIPS (Cross-Border Interbank Payment System) was launched in 2015 by the People's Bank of China. Originally intended for RMB settlement, it has developed into a serious SWIFT alternative.

Status May 2026

• 193 direct + 1,573 indirect participants
• 124 countries
• 4,900+ correspondent banks across 189 countries
• 2024: 8.2M transactions, RMB 175T = $24.5T volume (+42.6% y-o-y)
• February 2026: multi-currency support arrives — CIPS no longer handles only RMB

Tech Stack

CIPS is hybrid: RTGS for individual payments + timed-net-settlement for batches. The rules update that took effect early 2026 standardizes this separation and gives PBoC more steering room.

Importantly: CIPS uses its own messaging, not SWIFT. Banks can connect directly to CIPS or via SWIFT bridges — increasingly a choice.

Strengths

• Massive reach: 124 countries, most global megabanks connected
• Volume: $91B daily volume is real-world scale, not a pilot
• Sanctions resistance: relevant SWIFT alternative for countries under US sanctions
• Multi-currency since 2026: no longer only RMB tool, strategic expansion

Weaknesses

• PBoC-controlled: politically vulnerable, compliance with Chinese policy required
• Western banks hesitant: dual-use risk with US sanctions
• Complex onboarding: banking license + correspondent bank setup required

What CIPS Means Strategically

CIPS is the systemic answer to USD dominance. It's not big enough to replace SWIFT ($24.5T CIPS vs. $150T+ SWIFT), but big enough to be parallel infrastructure. For many countries, that's enough.

The Iran-war context accelerates CIPS adoption. Countries operating in tension fields want backup settlement. CIPS provides that.

System 3: mBridge — The CBDC Pilot

What It Is

mBridge (multi-CBDC bridge) is a joint pilot by the central banks of China, Hong Kong, Thailand, UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Originally co-initiated by the BIS Innovation Hub, BIS left the project in October 2024 — a political signal.

Status May 2026

• $55.5B cumulative volume
• 4,000+ transactions
• 95% of settlement volume runs through e-CNY (digital yuan)
• 2,500× growth since the 2022 pilots
• India, as 2026 BRICS host, proposed coupling BRICS CBDCs to mBridge

Tech Stack

mBridge uses its own custom blockchain (mBridge Ledger), operated jointly by participating central banks. No public mining, no staking — a permissioned consortium blockchain.

Settlement happens atomically between CBDCs on the ledger. When a UAE bank swaps Dirham CBDC against Yuan CBDC, it happens in seconds, in a single transaction, without FX correspondent bank.

Strengths

• Atomic multi-CBDC settlement: no FX risk in settlement phase
• 24/7 capable: blockchain-based, not banking-hours bound
• Central-bank sanctioned: no compliance grey zone

Weaknesses

• Pilot, not production: $55B in 4 years is small. Tron-USDT moves that in 2-3 days.
• 95% e-CNY share: not really multi-CBDC, but China-Plus extension
• BIS exit 2024: western distancing, politically
• No private-sector access: only central banks + selected commercial banks

What mBridge Means Strategically

mBridge is the radical answer to USD dominance. It's the only one of the three that doesn't build on bank infrastructure, but on its own blockchain. Strategically interesting: it creates infrastructure that completely bypasses the western banking system.

But: 95% e-CNY volume share and BIS exit signal that mBridge is effectively more of a Chinese CBDC reach extension than a neutral multi-CBDC system.

The Table Nobody Compiles

What This Means for the Discussion

1. "Stablecoin disrupts banking" is a Western discourse

In Africa, China, BRICS, settlement problems are solved by state-backed infrastructure — not by private stablecoins. PAPSS, CIPS, mBridge are three different state answers, all without crypto.

Tron-USDT exists in parallel as a shadow layer, but not as planned replacement — as pragmatic gap-filling where state infrastructure is (still) missing.

2. Post-USD settlement is happening — but slowly and politically

PAPSS is live in only 12 countries after 4 years. CIPS took 11 years to reach $24T. mBridge is a pilot.

This isn't "AI agents will transform cross-border in 24 months." These are generational projects. Anyone thinking at this scale isn't ignoring the geopolitical shifts since 2022 — anyone thinking in quarters is.

3. Reality is multi-rail

Treasury teams in 2026 must understand all three systems, plus SWIFT, plus stablecoin rails, plus regional RTGS (SEPA, FedNow, UPI). "Pick a winner" is the wrong question. The right question is: which rail for which corridor at which time of day with which compliance profile?

That's the actual market for agent orchestration — and it's huge. But it won't be won by stablecoin religion, it'll be won by routing intelligence.

Conclusion

Three visions for post-USD settlement:

• PAPSS = conservative-continental (same tech, new politics)
• CIPS = systemic-Chinese (own tech, established market)
• mBridge = radical-experimental (new tech, small reach)

All three are running. All three matter politically. None alone will win. The next 5-10 years will be measured in settlement geography, not tech-stack choice.

Anyone discussing "the future of payments" in Europe without knowing these three systems is only discussing a partial market — the Western one.

---

Data sources: Afreximbank PAPSS reports, PBoC CIPS statistics 2024, Atlantic Council CBDC Tracker, Reuters, FXC Intelligence. As of May 2026.

Backtesting Arena is a backtesting platform for systematic trading. We provide APIs for historical market data and on-demand backtests — REST, MCP, and x402. Free tier available without signup.